Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9618 14
Original file (NR9618 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S$. COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 1901

 

ARLINGTON, VA

04-2490

   

     

From: Chairman, Board Or
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

   
  
 

 

memo 631 dtd 28 Oct 14

 

1. Pursuant to the provisions of r =re > (a) Subjex

  

titioner,

 

Enlisted Supe

 

 

rSe 68-14
ere nat ey

 

 

   

paps pte a's wy ped 1;
roxrrer re 4
COSLIECtCLIve acti Cll
raAeanrte = reo 1
radence OL rec f
paragon ee ase Hh nal
Cons. OL CN C

   

a

    
     

   
  
  
 
 

     

3 all L~aCLsS O© reco. T
+ one of er} » e Finds
o LOMns oO = = = 1 LT” LCE, Lil
ann) -—- * ec Rnsara 4 eyvha
PPL LO 4 Ss bDbOdalu, t SsLle

    

remedies available un

ccment of the Navy.

Ih
ae

having co
applicati
warrants

CONCLUSION

   

Upon review and consideration of all re
especially in Light t!

the existence o

action.

 

 

 

  

egulations
: Fis
+ 4 —5 + = 4
has merit and

 

d finds
ve
Docket No. NR9618-14

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to

i.
show tha

m

ct

a. Prior the Petitioner’s reenlist

submitted to
and approved

ar
ct
Oo

L3

ri

ey)

D. The request was
r to his reenlistme

 

io e-4
Oo

b. This change will entitle the Petitioner to a zone “2" ESRP
with an award level of 2.5 for the ETSS/3363 rate/NEC. Note: contact

N123D3 at J or email for assistance

with payment calculation if necessary

ts
oD

ie

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

rtified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
a

ce
ions, and that the foregoing is a true and comple
ceedings in the above atte ee Te

te record of

eS 20CUlLU

 

   
 
 
           

 

5 Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in
} P jures of the Board f: Correction of

gulations, Sect

authority

 

MN

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2686 14

    Original file (NR2686 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hedrick, Marquez and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (4), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, has commented to the effect that both contested fitness reports should be removed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2896 14

    Original file (NR2896 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Fxnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14

    Original file (NR5583 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10558-09

    Original file (10558-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 September ove administrative separation action was initiated by reason 0 am 7 a eine ; 74° a Vado 4 os misconduct for drug abuse You waived your rights to consult iL SCor#n C £ rug DUSe . The Board noted that you waived your rights to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a more favorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR838 14

    Original file (NR838 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 17 July 2009 with her rebuttal dated 21 July 2009 (copies at Tab A). Pursuant to the Board's regulations, the Board determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8541 14

    Original file (NR8541 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL REGORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD SUI 4001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-249( Dd Docket JUL» wed di Lice, Tr: Sub}: 3 OF NAVAL RECORD = ms 4 1 mer \a 1 at LJ eo \ r a ATT) iss ere ” 2 14UL2Z4 22 sep 14 Pursuant Or 2 om DocUMENn Lary Mar > cConsidge: Sis x ne qT) SuUres ee a ike AT app-itas oo commented to t ell = t i eque na 5 C ble action. d. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will 6 Petitioner's naval record. the Board's review and 4, It is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8123 14

    Original file (NR8123 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Board for Correction of Naval Records of the Navy 2. The Board, consis reviewed Petitioner's 5792 23 March 2015 and, Pf : tt mM f b- yorsp Hw 0 @ or Hs | OM & ct QQ Y Fh cr .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR764 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14

    Original file (NR12921 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6674 13

    Original file (NR6674 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pot Or LP Rm DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY by eS me oN BOARD FAP CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ' © jose 1y1 ©, COURTHOUSE ROAD. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...